Harrison v. Public Storage et al
| Mikal Cordova Harrison |
| Public Storage, CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection, Gillaspy Rhode Faddis & Benn LLC, Seyarth Shaw LLP, Elizabeth Rhode, Andrew Escobar, Chris Bouquet, Brenda Radmacher and Does 1 - 10 |
| 2:2025cv02431 |
| November 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| John H Chun |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge John H. Chun. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within ten (10) days of the date of this order why Defendants Gillaspy Rhode Faddis & Benn LLC, Seyarth Shaw LLP, Elizabeth Rhode, Andrew Escobar, Chris Bouquet, Brenda Radmacher, and Does 1-10 should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4(m). (AD)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Unavailability of counsel Sean Reilly for Defendant CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection from 08/03/2026-08/17/2026. (Reilly, Sean) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Unavailability of counsel Sean Reilly for Defendant CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection from 06/24-26; 6/29; 11/13-16; 11/23-27; 123-4;12/7-11;12/21/23. (Reilly, Sean) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Todd A Bowers on behalf of Defendant Public Storage. (Bowers, Todd) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Sean Reilly on behalf of Defendant CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection. (Reilly, Sean) |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection (Bhatt, Sitar) |
| Filing 9 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection (Bhatt, Sitar) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Gordon C Klug Sitar Bhatt on behalf of Defendant CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection. (Bhatt, Sitar) Modified on 2/4/2026 (APH). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action ; filed by Plaintiff Mikal Cordova Harrison. (Harrison, Mikal) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE: Plaintiff Mikal Cordova Harrison has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (CKC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Plaintiff Mikal Cordova Harrison has registered to receive electronic service. The party WILL NOT be e-filing. (LH) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Chris Bouquet, CFP Fire Protection/Moore Fire Protection, Does 1 - 10, Andrew Escobar, Gillaspy Rhode Faddis & Benn LLC, Public Storage, Brenda Radmacher, Elizabeth Rhode, Seyarth Shaw LLP with JURY DEMAND filed by Mikal Cordova Harrison. (APH) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (APH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Michelle L. Peterson. ***Action Required*** Notice of Pendency of Other Action.See attached letter for more information and instructions. cc Plaintiff via email and USPS. (HH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Michelle L. Peterson filed by Mikal Cordova Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Bouquet, #4 Summons CFP, #5 Summons Escobar, #6 Summons GRFB, #7 Summons Public Storage, #8 Summons Radmacher, #9 Summons Rhode, #10 Summons Seyfarth, #11 Email Transmittal) (HH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
