Williams v. Kitsap County et al
Plaintiff: Mark Williams
Defendant: Kitsap County, Ben Herrin, Jane Doe Herrin, Paul Woodrum and Jane Doe Woodrum
Case Number: 3:2008cv05430
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Kitsap
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 205 ORDER granting 202 Motion for Order Approving Settlement and dismissing this matter with prejudice, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 196 STIPULATION AND ORDER 195 of dismissal as to Cecilia Gould's claims against defendants Kitsap County, Herrin, Woodrum and Cleere. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (MET)
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER denying 143 Plaintiffs Williams and Gould's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 144 Plaintiff Gould's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 148 Defendant Olson's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 154 Defendants Herrin, Woodrum, Cleere and Kitsap County's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 178 MINUTE ORDER regarding the Court's decision on the following motions: 109 MOTION to Exclude Junk Scientist Kay Sweeney Under Daubert is DENIED in part and GRANTED without prejudice in part. 121 MOTION to Compel Kurtis Lont to Answ er Deposition Questions and to Require Defendants to Pay Expenses of Reconvened Deposition is DENIED. No terms or sanctions shall be awarded. 124 MOTION to Compel Defendants to Produce Things for Inspection and Testing is outlined in this minute order; 145 MOTION to Exclude Defense Expert George Williams is DENIED. s/Jean Boring as directed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (See Minute Order for Specific Details)(JAB)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 135 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 128 Re: Release of Evidence, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
July 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion to Compel, as set forth more fully in the Order. Discovery deadline extended to 7/27/2009. Request for attorney fees denied. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
June 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting 69 Motion for Order Challenging Expert Deposition Fee, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
June 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 86 PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
June 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER to Consolidate re 72 MOTION to Consolidate Cases C08-5430 and C09-5281. These matters are consolidated into the lead case C08-5430RBL. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
May 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER Denying 4 Kitsap County's MOTION for Summary Judgment seeking dismissal on Plaintiff's Monell claims, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
May 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 50 Motion for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint. Counsel for plaintiff is instructed to efile the Amended Complaint, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
May 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Supplement Opposition to Kitsap County's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Kitsap County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Williams
Represented By: Guy William Beckett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kitsap County
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Herrin
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe Herrin
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Woodrum
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe Woodrum
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?