Wright et al v. Pierce County et al
| Harold Wright and Sydni Wright |
| Jane Doe Horne, Mark Lindquist, Jane Doe Lindquist, Paul Pastor, Jane Doe Pastor, Mary Robnett, John Doe Robnett, Lori Kooiman, Mark Parfitt, Jane Doe Parfitt, James Harai, Jane Doe Harai, Ken Board, Jane Doe Board, Pierce County and Gerald Horne |
| 3:2011cv05154 |
| February 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| Benjamin H Settle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Benjamin H Settle. This matter shall be remanded to King County Superior Court for the State of Washington. (TG)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle granting 45 Motion to Amend (Counsel is directed to e-file their Amended Complaint); granting 68 Motion to correct document; Defendant's motion to strike 69 is granted; and Wright's motion to strike 83 is denied. 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Noting Date 8/2/2013.(TG)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle granting 46 Motion for Protective Order; granting 48 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.(TG)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER by Judge Benjamin H Settle denying 10 Motion to Remand; granting 7 Motion to Stay. Parties to file joint status report by October 1, 2011. (TG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
