Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
In re: William Wright, Jr.
as 24-11191
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Wright, Jr. v. Allen, et al
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant:
CMC ALLEN, COUNSELOR EZZOLO and CASE MANAGER GABRIEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
William Wright, Jr. v. USA
as 23-12157
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wright v. Jamison
as 23-674
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jamal L. Jamison
Baltrusaitis et al v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 2:2023cv10861
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baltrusaitis, Guillermo Antunez, Patrick Barth and others
Defendant:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, FCA US, LLC, f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC, Alphons Iacobelli and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Wright v. Jamison
as 8:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Jamal L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv01570
Petitioner:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Respondent:
Jamal L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
William Wright, Jr.In re: William Wright, Jr.
as 22-13685
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
