Wade v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Ace Eldon Wade, Jr
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv05953
Filed: November 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Cowlitz
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H Settle
Presiding Judge: Karen L Strombom
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427 Social Security Benenfits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 35 Report and Recommendations. (TG)
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wade v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ace Eldon Wade, Jr
Represented By: Philip Bradley Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?