Stacy v. Pierce County et al
| Scott Ryan Stacy |
| Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson, Maldonado, Peck, Assoc Supt Warren, Delgado, Kim, Miller, Masandrea, Dobson and Smith |
| 3:2023cv05718 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| John H Chun |
| Grady J Leupold |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to the Court; filed by Plaintiff Scott Ryan Stacy. (MW) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall correct the deficiencies listed in the Clerk's 8/10/2023, Notice (Dkt. #2 ) or pay the $402.00 filing fee on or before 10/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time re filing fee, filed by Plaintiff Scott Ryan Stacy. Noted by Clerk for 9/8/2023. (MW) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Application. ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 9/11/2023 to correct IFP application (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Scott R Stacy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint)(MW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
