Kandel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Northern District Kandel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Kandel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Mary J. Kandel
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2009cv00031
Filed:	February 12, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County:	Webster
Presiding Judge:	David J. Joel
Presiding Judge:	Irene M Keeley
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2010	Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to 17 Report and Recommendation. DENIES 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Mary J. Kandel. GRANTS 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security. DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE and RETIRES this civil action from the docket of this court. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/31/2010. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF) (jmm)
November 4, 2009	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE RECOMMENDING THAT THE DISTRICT COURT GRANT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 , DENY PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 , AND AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mary J. Kandel,and re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security Objections to R&R due by 11/19/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Joel on 11/4/2009. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF) (jmm)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2010

Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to 17 Report and Recommendation. DENIES 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Mary J. Kandel. GRANTS 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security. DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE and RETIRES this civil action from the docket of this court. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/31/2010. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF) (jmm)

November 4, 2009

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE RECOMMENDING THAT THE DISTRICT COURT GRANT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 , DENY PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 , AND AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mary J. Kandel,and re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security Objections to R&R due by 11/19/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Joel on 11/4/2009. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF) (jmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kandel v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary J. Kandel
Represented By:	Montie VanNostrand
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Helen Campbell Altmeyer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?