QUINN v. GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CANDI QUINN |
GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
1:2009cv00082 |
June 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Clarksburg Office |
Monongalia |
Irene M Keeley |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 15 ), DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 20 ) AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 2/24/2010. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF)(jmm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: QUINN v. GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CANDI QUINN | |
Represented By: | Alex J. Shook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GARDEN STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | Scott K Sheets |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.