Bishoff v. Medtronic Incorporated
Plaintiff: Betty L Bishoff
Defendant: Medtronic Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2009cv00171
Filed: December 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Clarksburg Office
County: Monongalia
Presiding Judge: Irene M. Keeley
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS DKT. NO. 31 , AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DKT. NO. 11 . Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 11/22/2010. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF)(jmm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishoff v. Medtronic Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty L Bishoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?