USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Smith et al
USAA Casualty Insurance Company |
Paul Garrett Smith, P.H. One Trucking, David S Gilb, Universal Forest Products, Inc., John Doe and John Doe Brake Repair Shop, Inc. |
1:2010cv00115 |
July 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Clarksburg Office |
Monongalia |
Irene M. Keeley |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND OORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Defendants' 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The Clerk shall enter a separate judgment order against the Defendants in the amount of $136,792.18. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 9/12/13. (cnd) |
Filing 46 ORDER/OPINION granting Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Compel. The Court directs Defendants to give notice to the Ammermullers, Cerabone, and Woods, within 7 days of entry of this order, that the confidential agreement and surrounding facts are to b e produced to USAA. The Ammermullers, Cerabone, and Woods shall then have fourteen (14) days from said Notice to file with this Court anyobjections they may have to the production. The Court ORDERS Defendants to respond in full to USAAs First Set of Discovery to Defendants within seven (7) days of the date any such objection was due. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 3/21/12. (jss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.