Anderson v. Consolidation Coal Company et al
| Joyce Anderson |
| Consolidation Coal Company and Consol Energy, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00138 |
| September 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Clarksburg Office |
| Marion |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
321
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY AND DENYING ALL CURRENTLY PENDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND OTHER PENDING NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL MOTIONS AS MOOT. The Court grants Defendants' 207 Motion for Summary Judgment; denies as moot 209 Motion to Strike ; denies as moot 210 Motion to Strike ; denies as moot 211 Motion in Limine; denies as moot 212 Motion in Limine; denies as mo ot 213 Motion in Limine; grants 275 Motion for Leave to File; denies as moot 278 Motion in Limine; denies as moot 279 Motion in Limine; denies as moot 280 Motion in Limine; denies as moot 282 Motion in Limine; denies as moot 314 Motion for Leave to File; denies as moot 315 Motion. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 9/5/14. (mh)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER/OPINION granting 170 Motion to Compel. Consol shall serve adequate and complete responses to the discovery requests at issue, as modified above, within fourteen (14) calendar days following entry of this Order/Opinion. The Court further ORDERS that the responses be disclosed subject to the Agreed Protective Order previously entered by the Court 85 . Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 4/23/14. (mh)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONFIRMING PRONOUNCED ORDER OF THE COURT: Granting 50 Plaintiff's Motion to File a Surreply; and Denying 39 Def's Motion to Dismiss.
|
|
Filing
37
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Leave to File Surreply. The plaintiff's motion for leave to file an a mended complaint 34 is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the plaintiff's amended complaint. Further, the defendants' motion to dismiss 19 and the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply 33 are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE subject to refiling based upon the allegations and contents of the amended complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 10/25/12.(mh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
