WV Therapy Services, LLC v. Moshe Orlinsky
Plaintiff: WV Therapy Services, LLC
Defendant: Moshe Orlinsky
Case Number: 1:2012cv00124
Filed: July 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Clarksburg Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Irene M. Keeley
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT DKT. NO. 21 . Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 1/18/2013. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF)(jmm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WV Therapy Services, LLC v. Moshe Orlinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WV Therapy Services, LLC
Represented By: Douglas Luke Thomas
Represented By: Robert L. Greer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moshe Orlinsky
Represented By: Caleb Paul Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?