Thomack v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomack
Defendant:
West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.
Case Number:
1:2013cv00031
Filed:
February 22, 2013
Court:
West Virginia Northern District Court
Office:
Clarksburg Office
County:
Webster
Presiding Judge:
Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit:
Contract: Other
Cause of Action:
28:1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
October 3, 2013 | 16 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomack v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nathan I. Brown |
Represented By: | Marc E. Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christopher Thomack | |
Represented By: | Edmund L Wagoner, III |
Represented By: | Christopher J. Regan |
Represented By: | David E. Goddard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.