Tipple Enterprise, LLC v. Kingsford Manufacturing Company et al
Plaintiff: Tipple Enterprise, LLC
Defendant: Kingsford Manufacturing Company and Thomas J. Bonner
Counter_claimant: Kingsford Manufacturing Company
Counter_defendant: Tipple Enterprise, LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv00146
Filed: May 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Clarksburg Office
County: Barbour
Presiding Judge: Irene M. Keeley
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Defendant's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment, 48 Motion for Summary Judgment are granted in part and denied in part. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 9/30/14. (cnd)
January 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER/OPINION: Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the sum of $1,172.00 to counsel for Defendant within 30 days of entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 1/3/14. (cnd)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER/OPINION: It is ORDERED that Kingford's 27 Motion to Compel is granted. Plaintiff shall serve responses within 10 calendar days of entry of this Order. Kingsford shall submit its claim for reasonable expenses by 12/17/13. Plaintiff shall have until 12/31/13 to file any written objection to the claimed expenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 12/11/13. (cnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tipple Enterprise, LLC v. Kingsford Manufacturing Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kingsford Manufacturing Company
Represented By: Alexis B Mattingly
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas J. Bonner
Represented By: Alexis B Mattingly
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tipple Enterprise, LLC
Represented By: Gregory H. Schillace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Kingsford Manufacturing Company
Represented By: J. David Bolen
Represented By: Alexis B Mattingly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Tipple Enterprise, LLC
Represented By: Gregory H. Schillace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?