State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cottrell

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Northern District State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cottrell

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cottrell

Plaintiff:	State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:	Michael S. Cottrell
Case Number:	1:2013cv00205
Filed:	September 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Clarksburg Office
County:	Marion
Presiding Judge:	Irene M. Keeley
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2014	Filing 14 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Dismiss is granted; Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as moot; Plaintiff's 1 Complai nt is dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's 13 Motion Requesting Factual Correction is denied as moot; and the Clerk is directed to remove this case from its active docket and enter a separate judgment order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/8/14. (cnd)
July 31, 2014	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS DKT. NO. 10 . DENIES AS MOOT 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE State Farms complaint dkt. no. 1 and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter a separate judgment order and remove this case from its active. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 7/31/2014. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF) (jmm)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2014

Filing 14 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Dismiss is granted; Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as moot; Plaintiff's 1 Complai nt is dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's 13 Motion Requesting Factual Correction is denied as moot; and the Clerk is directed to remove this case from its active docket and enter a separate judgment order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/8/14. (cnd)

July 31, 2014

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS DKT. NO. 10 . DENIES AS MOOT 9 Motion for Summary Judgment. DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE State Farms complaint dkt. no. 1 and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter a separate judgment order and remove this case from its active. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 7/31/2014. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF) (jmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Cottrell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Represented By:	Walter M. Jones, III
Represented By:	Lisa A. Green
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael S. Cottrell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?