Wilson v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
| Melissa Wilson |
| U.S. Department of Justice and United States of America |
| 1:2015cv00018 |
| February 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Clarksburg Office |
| Preston |
| Irene M. Keeley |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS: It is ORDERED that Defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED and DISMISSES the case WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment order and to remove this case from the Court's active docket. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/31/16. (cnd)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION, GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND, AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS: It is O RDERED that Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Vacate Order of Substitution is DENIED, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Ruling on Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff sh all file any response to 9 Motion to Dismiss within 14 days from entry of this Order. The Government shall file any reply no more than 7 days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 2/29/16. (cnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
