Kvaerner North American Construction Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Northern District Kvaerner North American Construction Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Kvaerner North American Construction Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Kvaerner North American Construction Inc.
Defendant:	Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. 509/DL486507
Case Number:	1:2015cv00210
Filed:	November 6, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Clarksburg Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Irene M. Keeley
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2017	Filing 111 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 100 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; Def endant's 102 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this case is STRICKEN from the active docket. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 6/28/17. (cnd) Modified security, NEF regenerated to counsel on 6/29/2017 (cnd).

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2017

Filing 111 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 100 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; Def endant's 102 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this case is STRICKEN from the active docket. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 6/28/17. (cnd) Modified security, NEF regenerated to counsel on 6/29/2017 (cnd).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kvaerner North American Construction Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kvaerner North American Construction Inc.
Represented By:	Skip Durocher
Represented By:	Bryan Keane
Represented By:	Jocelyn Knoll
Represented By:	Katie Pfeifer
Represented By:	Christopher B. Power
Represented By:	Mychal S Schulz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Represented By:	William M. Harter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. 509/DL486507
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?