Larry v. The Marion County Coal Company et al
| Alyssa Moate Larry |
| The Marion County Coal Company and Murray American Energy, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00212 |
| November 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Clarksburg Office |
| Monongalia |
| Irene M. Keeley |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART DEFENDANT MARION COUNTY COAL COMPANYS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. NO. 75 ) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT MURRAY AMERICAN ENERGY, INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. NO. 77 ). The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part MCCs motion for summary judgment on Count One (Dkt. No. 75 ) and DISMISSES Larrys state law retaliation claim, WITH PREJUDICE, GRANTS MAEIs motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 77 ) and DIS MISSES Count Two, WITH PREJUDICE and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part MCCs motion for summary judgment on Count Three (Dkt. No. 75) and DISMISSES Larrys FMLA interference claim, WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment order as to defendant Murray American Energy, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge Irene M. Keeley on 1/31/18. (mh)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT OUT OF TIME (DKT. NO. 42 ) AND DENYING AS MOOT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEFENDANT'S EXTRANEOUS EVIDENCE (DKT. NO. 48 ). Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/2/16. (mh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
