Graham v. Antero Resources Corporation
| Luscious Graham |
| Antero Resources Corporation |
| Antero Resources Corporation |
| Luscious Graham |
| 1:2016cv00026 |
| February 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Clarksburg Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY AND DENYING AS MOOT PENDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE: It is ORDERED that Defendant's 56 M otion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Defendant's 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , and 73 Motions in Limine are DENIED AS MOOT; and Plaintiff's 54 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is DENIED. The Defendant&# 039;s counterclaim for declaratory judgment is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/7/17. (cnd)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Remand is DENIED, and the Defendant's 30 Motion to File a Second Supplemental Response is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 7/26/16. (cnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
