Frogge v. Fox
||September 8, 2017
||US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
||Michael John Aloi
||Irene M. Keeley
|Nature of Suit:
||Americans with Disabilities - Other
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 10, 2019
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DKT. NO. 60 , OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS DKT. NO. 61 , 57 , GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DKT. NO. 45 , AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT DKT. NO. 3 - 5 WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment order in this matter. Signed by District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh on 6/10/19. (mh) (Copy PS Plaintiff via cert. mail) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/10/2019: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (mh).
|June 26, 2018
ORDER REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DKT. NO. 16 ]: After conducting a de novo review of the R&R and the record, the Court: SUSTAINS Frogge's objections (Dkt. No. 18 ); REJECTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 16 ); DENIES Fox's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 4 ); DENIES AS MOOT Frogge's motions for a hearing (Dkt. Nos. 11 ; 19 ); and RECOMMITS this case to Magistrate Judge Aloi, who is authorized to consider the record and enter rulings orrecommendations as appropriate, including the e ntry of ascheduling order on discovery and dispositive motions. (Copy to PS Plaintiff via CM, RRR.) Signed by Senior Judge Irene M. Keeley on 6/26/2018. (wrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2018: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (wrr).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?