Sutton v. USA
Petitioner: Derrick Sutton
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2018cv00163
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Michael John Aloi
Referring Judge: Irene M Keeley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONERS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME as to Derrick Sutton. It appearing to the court that good cause exists, petitioners Response/Motion [ECF No.6] is hereby GRANTED in part. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the time by which the petitioner must respond to the Clerks Notice of Deficient Pleading is hereby designated as November 23, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 10/9/2018. (copy pro se petitioner via certified mail)(jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/9/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jmm).
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Response To Order Directing Petitioner To Show Cause/Motion for Extension of Time to comply with Deficiency notice re #4 Order To show Cause by Derrick Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmm) Modified on 10/9/2018 to change to a motion event (jmm).
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Order to Show Cause. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/21/2018. (jmm)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Derrick Sutton. The petitioner has fourteen (14) days from entry of this Order, to show cause why his case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to file the required form habeas petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 9/18/2018. (copy pro se petitioner via certified mail) (jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/18/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (wrr).
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. (Attachments: #1 Clarification letter from Deputy Clerk to Mr. Sutton)(To Petitioner with 2255 Packet via certified mail)(jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2018: #2 2255 packet, #3 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jmm).
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court. as (To PS Petitioner via certified mail) (jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jmm).
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Derrick Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmm)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi and PSLC Williams assigned to this case. (jmm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Zelda E. Wesley
Represented By: L. Danae DeMasi-Lemon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?