Windom v. Harshbarger
| Scott A. Windom |
| Jason S. Harshbarger |
| 1:2019cv00024 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas S Kleeh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Scott A. Windom. (Windom, Scott) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Jason S. Harshbarger re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Adkins, J.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Jason S. Harshbarger. (Adkins, J.) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Scott A. Windom. (Windom, Scott) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jason S. Harshbarger, filed by Scott A. Windom.(Windom, Scott) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. NO. #5 ) re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Jason S. Harshbarger for 4/23/2019 01:00 PM in Clarksburg District Judge Courtroom, 2nd Floor before District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh. Signed by District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh on 3/7/19. (mh)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER WITHDRAWING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DKT. NO. #2 ). Signed by District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh on 2/28/19. (mh)
|
| Filing 8 Withdrawal of motion for preliminary injunction Other Document re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Scott A. Windom. (Windom, Scott) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jason S. Harshbarger. (Adkins, J.) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Jason S. Harshbarger re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint . (Adkins, J.) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Jason S. Harshbarger. (Adkins, J.) |
| Filing 4 Duplicate Filing of #1 Notice Modified on 2/15/2019 (cmd). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Change of Attorney Information Other Document filed by Jason S. Harshbarger. (Adkins, J.) |
| Filing 2 Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Scott A. Windom. (mh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Ritchie County Circuit Court, (case number 19-C-3), filed by Jason S. Harshbarger. (Attachments: #1 Attachment State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Windom v. Harshbarger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott A. Windom | |
| Represented By: | Scott A Windom |
| Represented By: | Rodney C. Windom |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jason S. Harshbarger | |
| Represented By: | Richard R. Heath, Jr. |
| Represented By: | J. Mark Adkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
