Westfall v. Trump et al
Joseph L. Westfall |
Donald J. Trump and Steven T. Mnuchin |
1:2020cv00207 |
August 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Michael John Aloi |
Irene M Keeley |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 OBJECTION to #15 Report and Recommendations. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jss) |
Filing 16 RETURN RECEIPT as to #15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/9/20. (jss) |
Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs Complaint [ECF No. #1 be DISMISSEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE by the District Court. It is further RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. #13 be denied as moot.Any party may within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation file with the Clerk of the Court Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 10/7/20. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(jss) |
Filing 14 Addendum to #12 Response TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and #13 Motion for Summary Judgment by Joseph L. Westfall. (Attachments: #1 Attachment IRS Reminder, #2 Envelope)(jss) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Joseph L. Westfall. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jss) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE by Joseph L. Westfall to #10 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jss) |
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 Order to Show Cause. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/14/20. (jss) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Petitioner is ORDERED to show cause within FOURTEEN (14) days from the receipt of this Order as to why his case should not be dismissed without prejudice. (cmrr) Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 9/9/20. (jss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jss). |
Filing 9 LETTER from Clerk of Court to Joseph L. Westfall returning personal check. (wrr) |
Filing 8 Other Document filed by Joseph L. Westfall regarding filing fee with a personal check. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(jss) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Joseph L. Westfall. (jss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2020: #1 Envelope) (cnd). |
Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk of Court to Joseph L. Westfall returning personal check. (wrr) (Main Document 6 replaced on 8/26/2020 with corrected letter) (wrr). |
Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #2 Letter, #3 Notice, #4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 8/22/20. (cnd) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL: The Court REFERS this action to the Honorable Michael J. Aloi, United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct a scheduling conference and issue a scheduling order, for written orders or reports and recommendations, as the case may be, regarding any motions filed, and to dispose of any other matters that may arise. Signed by Senior Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/19/20. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(jss) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court. (jss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/19/2020: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jss). |
Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk to Joseph Westfall. (Attachments: #1 IFP application)(jss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/19/2020: #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jss). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven T. Mnuchin, Donald J. Trump filed by Joseph L. Westfall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(jss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.