Moore v. MHM Support Services et al
| Joy Moore |
| Mercy Health, LLC and MHM Support Services |
| 1:2021cv00021 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas S Kleeh |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 4/26/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/10/2021. Discovery due by 5/26/2021. Signed by District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh on 3/23/2021. (wrr)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by MHM Support Services, Mercy Health, LLC. (Danaher, Maria) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Cory E. Ridenour on behalf of MHM Support Services, Mercy Health, LLC (Ridenour, Cory) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Maria G Danaher on behalf of MHM Support Services, Mercy Health, LLC (Danaher, Maria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MHM Support Services, Mercy Health, LLC, filed by Joy Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jmm) Filing Fee PAID $402. Receipt #0424-3202100. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
