Silbaugh et al v. Monongalia Health System, Inc. et al
Rachel Silbaugh, Robin Stripling and Michael Stripling |
Monongalia Health System, Inc., Monongalia County General Hospital Company, Stonewall Jackson Memorial Hospital Company and Preston Memorial Corporation |
1:2022cv00033 |
April 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Thomas S Kleeh |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 DISMISSAL ORDER. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh on 8/4/2022. (jb) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Troy, Mark) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 23 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number WVNC003478 for Attorneys David A. Carney and Sean E. McIntyre. (jmm) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sean E. McIntyre by Monongalia Health System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Jessee, Russell) |
Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David A. Carney by Monongalia Health System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Jessee, Russell) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION re #17 MOTION to Dismiss --Oral Argument Requested Stipulated Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to Respond by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Troy, Mark) |
Filing 19 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION to Attorney David A. Carney. (dk) |
Filing 18 Memorandum in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss --Oral Argument Requested filed by Monongalia Health System, Inc.. (Jessee, Russell) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss --Oral Argument Requested by Monongalia Health System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Jessee, Russell) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond Until July 1, 2022 by Monongalia Health System, Inc.. (Jessee, Russell) |
![]() |
Filing 13 Amended MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Francesca Kester by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Troy, Mark) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number WVNC003429 attorneys F. Kester and J. Martin. (jmm) |
Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number WVNC003428 for Attorneys David Leitz and Gary Kinger. (jmm) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Francesca Kester by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Troy, Mark) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jean Sutton Martin by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Troy, Mark) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gary M. Klinger by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Troy, Mark) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David K. Lietz by Rachel Silbaugh, Michael Stripling, Robin Stripling. (Troy, Mark) |
Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION for David Lietz, Francesca Kester, Gary M. Klinger, Jean S. Martin. (jmm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michael Stripling, Rachel Silbaugh, Robin Stripling. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Filing Fee PAID $402. Receipt #AWVNDC-3461750. (jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2022: #2 Exhibit 1) (jmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.