Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Lisa Machell Kelley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv00036
Filed: April 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Kleeh
Referring Judge: James P Mazzone
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security (U.S. Attorney) served on 5/6/2022. (kam)
May 12, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security (U.S. Attorney General) served on 5/9/2022. (kam)
May 12, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security (Social Security Administration) served on 5/9/2022. (kam)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING #2 PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND AFFIDAVIT AND GRANTING #3 MOTION FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY U.S. MARSHAL. The Clerk of the Court shall issue the summons and send the same to the U.S. Marshal Service, who shall serve the summons and Complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.The Court ORDERS and NOTICES that in accordance with LR Gen P 3.01, Plaintiff shall stipulate in an affidavit that any recovery in the action shall, pursuant to the order of the Court, be paid to the Clerk, who shall pay therefrom any remaining unpaid costs taxed against the Plaintiff and remit the balance to the Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 04/28/2022. (kam)
April 27, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION For Service of Process by United States Marshal re #1 Complaint by Lisa Machell Kelley. (kam)
April 27, 2022 Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa Machell Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(kam)
April 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Lisa Machell Kelley. No Filing Fee Paid IFP Motion Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Assignment of EAJA Fees, #3 Proposed Summons Office of General Counsel, #4 Proposed Summons US Attorney General, #5 Proposed Summons USA NDWV, #6 USM-285 Office of Regional Counsel, #7 USM-285 US Attorney General, #8 USM-285 USA NDWV)(kam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Machell Kelley
Represented By: Brian D. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?