Roberts v. Barnes et al
| Alexis Roberts |
| Emily Barnes, Laure Marino, Justine Burnett, Tara Hulsey, Carrie Showalter and Kari Sand-Jecklin |
| 1:2022cv00065 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas S Kleeh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason J. Bach on behalf of Alexis Roberts. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh on 9/15/2022. (jb)
|
|
Filing 5
PHV Filing fee for J. Bach in the amount of $ 200.00. Receipt number WVNC003500. (jb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason Bach on behalf of Alexis Roberts. (jb)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE - Case filing began in CM/ECF shell case, with filing fee being paid through pay.gov on 8/10/2022. However, filer failed to complete filing process, following receipt of payment. Clerk's office notified filer of the incomplete document filing and complaint was received on 8/12/2022. (jb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Defendants Emily Barnes, Laure Marino, Justine Burnett, Tara Hulsey, Carrie Showalter and Kari Sand-Jecklin filed by Alexis Roberts. FILING FEE $402 received 8/10/2022. RECEIPT # AWVNDC-3527959. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jb) Modified on 8/12/2022 (jb).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
