Augmon v. State of West Virginia et al
Charles Ray Augmon, III |
State of West Virginia and A. Cather |
1:2022cv00107 |
October 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Michael John Aloi |
Thomas S Kleeh |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice and #4 Order Referring Motion to Charles Ray Augmon, III. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/28/2022. (jb) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL: The Court REFERS this matter to the Honorable Michael J. Aloi, United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct a scheduling conference and issue a scheduling order, for written orders or reports and recommendations, as the case may be, regarding any motions filed, and to dispose of any other matters that may arise. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh on 10/18/2022. (Copy MJA, pro se plaintiff via certified mail)(jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jmm). |
Filing 3 Notice of General Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se In Federal Court as to Charles Ray Augmon, III (Copy via certified mail) (jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jmm). |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Ray Augmon, III. (jmm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Charles Ray Augmon, III. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.