Spatafore v. City of Clarksburg
| Dominique Spatafore |
| City of Clarksburg |
| 1:2022cv00108 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas S Kleeh |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings and Joinder of Parties due by 2/6/2023. Discovery due by 9/29/2023. Motions due by 10/6/2023. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/20/2023. Final Pretrial Conference/Settlement Conference set for 1/2/2024 10:00 AM in Clarksburg District Judge Courtroom, 2nd Floor before Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh. Jury Selection and Jury Trial set for 1/16/2024 09:30 AM in Clarksburg District Judge Courtroom, 2nd Floor before Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh. It is anticipated that the trial will take 4 days. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh on 12/09/2022. (jb)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Durst, Tiffany) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Dominique Spatafore OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION (Atkinson, John-Mark) (Main Document 7 replaced on 12/7/2022 to flatten the document) (jb). |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Count IV of the Complaint filed by Dominique Spatafore. (Atkinson, John-Mark) |
| Filing 5 Defendant City of Clarksburg's ANSWER to Complaint by City of Clarksburg.(Griffith, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Count IV of the Complaint filed by City of Clarksburg. (Durst, Tiffany) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Count IV of the Complaint by City of Clarksburg. (Durst, Tiffany) |
| Filing 2 FIRST ORDER AND NOTICE REGARDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING: ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS*** : Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ALL Non-governmental CORPORATE parties must file a DISCLOSURE STATEMENT with the Court. Forms are available on the Court's Web Site at http://www.wvnd.uscourts.gov/forms.htm Rule 26 Meeting to be held by 11/21/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/5/2022. Discovery due by 12/21/2022. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas S Kleeh on 10/19/2022. (jb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Papers from Harrison County Circuit Court, (case number 22-C-177-2), filed by City of Clarksburg. Filing Fee of $402 was Paid. Receipt #AWVNDC-3573774. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - State Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (jb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spatafore v. City of Clarksburg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dominique Spatafore | |
| Represented By: | John-Mark Atkinson |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Atkinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Clarksburg | |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel D. Griffith |
| Represented By: | Tiffany R. Durst |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
