Osborne v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company
| Timothy E. Osborne |
| Asplundh Tree Expert Company |
| 2:2007cv00007 |
| January 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Elkins Office |
| Preston |
| Robert E. Maxwell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER/OPINION denying 70 Motion to Take Deposition from Timothy Osborne and denying 73 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 2/19/09. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Osborne v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Asplundh Tree Expert Company | |
| Represented By: | John R. Callcott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy E. Osborne | |
| Represented By: | Gary S. Wigal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
