Marcum v. State of West Virginia

Plaintiff: Bruce Marcum
Defendant: State of West Virginia
Case Number: 2:2008cv00064
Filed: May 28, 2008
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Constitutional - State Statute Office
County: Randolph
Referring Judge: John S. Kaull
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Maxwell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 4, 2011 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Magistrate Kaull's 10 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and this matter is stricken from the active docket. Judgment shall be entered for the Defendant. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/4/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt label)(copy Plaintiff [7010 1870 0002 2855 4716])(cnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcum v. State of West Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Marcum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of West Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.