Vaughn v. USA
| Charles E. Vaughn |
| USA |
| 2:2008cv00096 |
| September 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office |
| Preston |
| Irene M Keeley |
| James E. Seibert |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Charles E. Vaughn be denied. Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 2/6/09. (copy Petitioner [7008 1830 0002 0045 1436])(cnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vaughn v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Robert H. McWilliams, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles E. Vaughn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
