KUSLER MASONRY, INC v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
KUSLER MASONRY, INC |
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA |
2:2009cv00082 |
July 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Elkins Office |
Lewis |
John Preston Bailey |
Defendant |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/16/09. (jss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: KUSLER MASONRY, INC v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KUSLER MASONRY, INC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Shawn P. George |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.