Merritt v. Hoke

Merritt v. Hoke

Petitioner:	Clifford Merritt
Respondent:	Adrian Hoke
Case Number:	2:2010cv00047
Filed:	April 9, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Elkins Office
County:	Randolph
Presiding Judge:	Robert E. Maxwell
Presiding Judge:	James E. Seibert
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2011	Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART/OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Order adopting in part and rejected in part the 28 Report and Recommendations and petitioner's 33 Objections are overruled inpart and sustained in part. As such, Respondent Warden Adrian Hoke's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part and the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, the petitioner's conviction and sent ence in Case NO. 02-F-186-1 before the Circuit Court of Harrison County is VACATED. (Copies pro se petitioner and Circuit Court of Harrison County) Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/18/11. (jss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/18/2011: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jss). Modified on 1/18/2011 - added certified mail receipt (jss).
November 19, 2010	Filing 28 OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Adrian Hoke, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Clifford Merritt. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 11/19/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt label)(copy Petitioner [7009 2250 0003 4210 4852])(cnd)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2011

Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART/OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Order adopting in part and rejected in part the 28 Report and Recommendations and petitioner's 33 Objections are overruled inpart and sustained in part. As such, Respondent Warden Adrian Hoke's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part and the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, the petitioner's conviction and sent ence in Case NO. 02-F-186-1 before the Circuit Court of Harrison County is VACATED. (Copies pro se petitioner and Circuit Court of Harrison County) Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/18/11. (jss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/18/2011: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jss). Modified on 1/18/2011 - added certified mail receipt (jss).

November 19, 2010

Filing 28 OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Adrian Hoke, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Clifford Merritt. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 11/19/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt label)(copy Petitioner [7009 2250 0003 4210 4852])(cnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merritt v. Hoke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Clifford Merritt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Represented By:	Silas B. Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?