Mason v. Wexford Health Sources et al
Kenneth Mason |
Wexford Health Sources, Adrian Hoke and Tristen Tenney |
2:2010cv00055 |
April 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Elkins Office |
Randolph |
Robert E. Maxwell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 ORDER adopting 106 Report and Recommendations. Ordered that plaintiff's 109 Objections are overruled. Order granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment and 96 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered that plaintiff's 1 Complaint and 14 Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice and stricken from the active docket. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/20/12. (jss) |
Filing 51 ORDER adopting in part the 42 Report and Recommendations. Order granting 21 Tenney's Motion to Dismiss and the Plaintiff's 1 Complaint with regard to defendant Tenney is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. ORDERED that Hoke and Wexford's Motions to Dismiss 18 and 34 are denied. Order denying plaintiff's 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Identify Defendant Nurses and defendant Nurses Jane Doe 1-8 are dismissed. ORDER denying 45 Motion for R eferral Back to Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation Based on the Entire Record. ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Magistrate for further proceedings in accordance with this Court's Order. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 1/11/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(jss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.