American Select Insurance Company et al v. Allegheny Insurance Services, Inc.
Westfield National Insurance Company, American Select Insurance Company and Westfield Insurance Company |
Allegheny Insurance Services, Inc. |
2:2011cv00049 |
June 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Elkins Office |
Randolph |
John Preston Bailey |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 210 MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 160 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Count V of AlleghenysCounterclaim [Doc. 49] is hereby DISMISSED, while Count I of Alleghenys Counterclaim and Count IV of Westfields Amended Complaint [Doc. 47] MAY PROCEED. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/15/12. (jss) |
Filing 91 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Westfield's 58 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, Counts II, III, IV (in part), V (in part) and VI (in part) of Allegheny's 49 Counterlca ims are dismissed, while Count I, IV (in part), V (in part) and VI (in part) may proceed. It is further ORDERED that Johnson's 60 Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, Counts I and III (in part) of Allegheny's 53 Third-Party Complaint are dismissed, while Count IV may proceed. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 4/2/12. (cnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.