Greathouse v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Northern District Greathouse v. Commissioner of Social Security

Greathouse v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Joelle Elizabeth Greathouse
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2016cv00062
Filed:	July 21, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Elkins Office
County:	Braxton
Presiding Judge:	John Preston Bailey
Presiding Judge:	James E. Seibert
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 10, 2017	Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's 17 Report and Recommendation is ORDERED ADOPTED; Plaintiff's 18 Objections are OVERRULED; Defendant's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRA NTED; and Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This Court hereby DENIES and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and ORDERS that this matter be STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Defendant. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/10/17. (cnd)
October 4, 2016	Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's 3 Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and Plaintiff's 2 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/4/16. (cnd)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 10, 2017

Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's 17 Report and Recommendation is ORDERED ADOPTED; Plaintiff's 18 Objections are OVERRULED; Defendant's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRA NTED; and Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This Court hereby DENIES and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and ORDERS that this matter be STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Defendant. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/10/17. (cnd)

October 4, 2016

Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's 3 Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and Plaintiff's 2 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/4/16. (cnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greathouse v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joelle Elizabeth Greathouse
Represented By:	Brian D. Bailey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?