Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. The City of Weston
Lamar Outdoor Advertising |
The City of Weston |
2:2017cv00082 |
June 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Elkins Office |
Harrison |
John Preston Bailey |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CITY OF WESTONS 41 MOTION TO DISMISSAND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. This Court grants leave for defendant to renew its Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 6/18/18. (njz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. The City of Weston | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lamar Outdoor Advertising | |
Represented By: | Robert L. Greer |
Represented By: | Jenna L. Robey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The City of Weston | |
Represented By: | Jason T. Gain |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.