Andrews v. FCI Gilmer
| Jerome Andrews |
| FCI Gilmer |
| 2:2018cv00107 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| John Preston Bailey |
| James P Mazzone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #8 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File, Order Dismissing Case. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 12/10/18. (njz) |
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #9 MOTION FOR EXTENSION AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/7/18. (njz) copy mailed to pro se pla via cert. return rec't mail (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2018: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (njz). Modified on 12/10/2018-corrected description of attachment (njz).
|
| Filing 9 (Styled as Notice of 30 Days) Pro Se MOTION for Extension of Time to File, MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jerome Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(njz) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOLLOWING NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS. The plaintiff's Motion [Doc. #7 is DENIED, and pursuant to the terms of the Notice, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 12/6/18. (njz) copy mailed to pro se pla via cert. return rec't mail (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2018: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (njz).
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Jerome Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(njz) |
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT as to #5 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/22/18. (njz) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING AND INTENT TO DISMISS. (njz) copy mailed to pro se pla with Bivens packet via cert. return rec't mail (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2018: #1 Attachment 1st page of Bivens, #2 Attachment 1st page of motion for IFP, #3 Attachment Consent to Collect, #4 Attachment PTAR, #5 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (njz). |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Michigan Eastern; Case Number 2:18-cv-12465. (njz) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Northern District of West Virginia. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (DPer) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/18/2018.]
|
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/18/2018.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jerome Andrews against FCI Gilmer (DAll) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 10/18/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrews v. FCI Gilmer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FCI Gilmer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jerome Andrews | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
