Strasburg v. Hardy County, WV, et al
William Strasburg |
Hardy County, WV and Moorefield Police Department, Hardy County, WV and Moorefield Police Department |
2:2022cv00006 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Michael John Aloi |
Thomas S Kleeh |
Civil Rights: Other |
18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 RETURN RECEIPT as to #20 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/18/22. (jss) |
Filing 20 OMNIBUS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS {ECF NOS 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19} BE DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 6/10/2022. (copy Plaintiff)(cnd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/10/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cnd). |
Filing 19 MOTION for Removal to Federal Court Under 28 USC 1441 and 1443, 18 USC 241 and 242, 42 USC 1983 by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 18 Additional MOTION for Emergency Hearing by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Emergency Hearing by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Injunction Under 18 USC Section 1512; 18 USC Section 241; 18 USC Section 242 by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 15 Second Notice MOTION for Removal to Federal Court Under 28 USC 1441 and 1443, 18 USC 241 and 242, 42 USC 1983 by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Removal to Federal Court Under 28 USC 1441 and 1443, 18 USC 241 and 242, 42 USC 1983 by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 13 CIVIL RELIEF filed by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE/OBJECTION to #10 Omnibus Report and Recommendation by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Letter to Plaintiff, #2 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 11 RETURN RECEIPT as to #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 6/6/2022. (cnd) |
Filing 10 OMNIBUS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AFTER INITIAL SCREENING, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #1 BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND THAT PLAINTIFF'S ANCILLARY MOTIONS #2 , #3 , #4 , #6 BE DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 5/31/2022. (copy Plaintiff)(cnd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/31/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cnd). |
Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 5/24/2022. (cnd) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT re #1 Complaint. (copy Plaintiff) (cnd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/16/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cnd). |
Filing 6 PRO SE MOTION for Emergency Hearing by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 5 NOTIFICATION OF SERVICE by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 4 PRO SE MOTION for Injunction Under 18 USC Section 1512, 18 USC Section 241, and 18 USC Section 242. by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION for Removal to Federal Court Under 28 USC 1441 and 1443, 18 USC 241 and 242, 42 USC 1983. by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** APPLICATION/MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hardy County, WV and Moorefield Police Department, filed by William Strasburg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope[Kleeh/Aloi](cnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.