Siler v. Chase Bank, USA
| Irene Siler |
| Chase Bank, USA |
| 3:2008cv00130 |
| August 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Consumer Credit Office |
| Berkeley |
| John Preston Bailey |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1446 Notice of Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying as moot 44 Motion for Leave to File; denying 31 Motion to Vacate Arbitrator's Decision and Lift Stay. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 2/25/2011. (cmd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Siler v. Chase Bank, USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Irene Siler | |
| Represented By: | James T. Kratovil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chase Bank, USA | |
| Represented By: | Bridget M. Cohee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
