Bowman v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff: Tina Bowman
Defendant: Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Case Number: 3:2012cv00031
Filed: April 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Martinsburg Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: Gina M. Groh
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION 21 TO COMPEL. Plaintiff is ordered to produce the documents requested by Defendant within 10 days. Parties may file objections to this Order within 14 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 10/11/2012. (tlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowman v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Bowman
Represented By: Aaron C. Amore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Green Tree Servicing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?