Paulino v. Dollar General Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Stephanie Paulino
Defendant: Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, LLC
Case Number: 3:2012cv00075
Filed: August 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Martinsburg Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: Gina M. Groh
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 158 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RULE 23 CLASS CERTIFICATION denying 102 Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 23 Class Certification and 140 Report and Recommendation. Grants 143 Defendants objections to MagistrateJudge Seiberts Report and Recommendation. The stay in this matter is lifted. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 5/9/2014. (cwm)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY granting in part 145 Motion to Stay. The Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants 145 motion for stay, and the Court ORDERS that proceedings are STAYED in this matter until the Court enters an Order resolving Defendants pending objections to Magistrate Judge Seiberts report and recommendation. At that time, the Court will order that the stay in this matter be lifted. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 4/1/2014. (cwm)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION denying 83 Emergency MOTION for Reconsideration re: 78 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 39 TO COMPEL AND AWARDING REASONABLE EXPENSES AND OVERRULING D EFENDANTS' 72 OBJECTIONS. The Court AFFIRMS its April 25, 2013 78 Memorandum Opinion and Order and declines to reconsider its opinion further. Defendants are ordered to produce the names and contact information of former employees within FOURTEEN (14) days of this Order. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 6/5/2013. (cwm)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 39 TO COMPEL AND AWARDING REASONABLE EXPENSES AND OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' 72 OBJECTIONS. The court lifts the stay of orders 55 and 71 . It is ordered that Plaintiff must file an affidavit of additional expenses by 5/3/2013. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 4/25/2013. (tlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paulino v. Dollar General Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Paulino
Represented By: Harry P. Waddell
Represented By: David M. Hammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dollar General Corporation
Represented By: Joel S. Allen
Represented By: Jason R. Elliott
Represented By: Larry J. Rector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dolgencorp, LLC
Represented By: Joel S. Allen
Represented By: Jason R. Elliott
Represented By: Larry J. Rector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?