Ehrlich et al v. Crown Enterprises, Inc. et al
Steve Allen Ehrlich and Jacqueline Ehrlich |
Crown Enterprises, Inc., Central Transport LLC, Central Transport Michigan LLC, Central Transport North America, Inc., GLS Leasco, Inc., Central Transport International, Inc. and Ronald J. Coffee |
3:2013cv00023 |
March 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Martinsburg Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Gina M. Groh |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 206 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEVER CASES FOR TRIAL denying 201 MOTION to Sever Cases for Trial. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 10/9/2014. (cwm) |
Filing 190 ORDER Granting 148 Plaintiff Garcia's Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 4/10/2014. (cmd) |
Filing 185 MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER Granting 117 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Crown Enterprises, Inc., Central Transport International, Inc., Central Transport North America, Inc., Central Transport Michigan, LLC, and GLS Leasco, Inc.: The Court FINDS no claims remain against them. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the Clerk to TERMINATE Defendants Crown Enterprises, Inc., Central Transport International, Inc., Central Transport North America, Inc., Central Transport Michigan, LLC, and GLS LeasCo, Inc. from this action. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 3/24/2014. (cmd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.