Royster v. O'Brien
Antoine Leroi Royster |
O'Brien |
3:2014cv00039 |
April 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Martinsburg Office |
Preston |
James E. Seibert |
Gina M. Groh |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DENIES the Petitioners 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition, 1 , and ORDERS that it be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This matter is ORDERED STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for the Respondent. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 4/29/15. (njz) copy mailed to pro se pet via cert. return rec't mail |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Royster v. O'Brien | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Antoine Leroi Royster | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: O'Brien | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.