Rahmi v. United States Trustee
Appellant: Alex Rahmi
Appellee: United States Trustee
Case Number: 3:2017cv00105
Filed: August 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Martinsburg Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: Gina M. Groh
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE BANKRUPTCY COURT'S ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 2/22/2018. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Appellant.(tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/22/2018: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rahmi v. United States Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Alex Rahmi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: United States Trustee
Represented By: Hugh M. Bernstein
Represented By: Steven A. Shay
Represented By: Debra A. Wertman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?