Harshbarger Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Karyn Lynn Harshbarger Williams
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2018cv00200
Filed: December 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Michael John Aloi
Referring Judge: Gina M Groh
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER: On January 25, 2019, Congress appropriated funds for the Department of Justice. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that the prior stay of this case be LIFTED. The Court further ORDERS that all prior deadlines remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on January 28, 2019.(af)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER: Upon review and consideration, the Governments' #9 Motion for a Stay of Case in Light of Lapse of Appropriations is hereby GRANTED. The Government shall notify the Court as soon as Congress has appropriated funds for the Department of Justice or enacted another continuing resolution. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on January 22, 2019. (af)
January 16, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Stay by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Altmeyer, Helen)
January 7, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to All Defendants. (Wilson, C.)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 12/20/2018. (cwm)
December 17, 2018 Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee for Karl E. Osterhout: $200.00 - receipt number WVNM001432 (cwm)
December 17, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Karl E. Osterhout filed by Karyn Lynn Harshbarger Williams. (Wilson, C.) Modified: to correct event type to motion and regenerate NEF on 12/17/2018 (cwm).
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Karyn Lynn Harshbarger Williams. (Wilson, C.)
December 11, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee: $400.00 - receipt number WVNM001430. (cwm)
December 11, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Karyn Lynn Harshbarger Williams. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cwm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harshbarger Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Helen Campbell Altmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karyn Lynn Harshbarger Williams
Represented By: C. Richard Wilson
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?