Bates v. Carpenter et al
| Richard L. Bates |
| Correctional Officer Radliff, Federal Bureau of Prisons Administration at FCI Gilmer and Lieutenant Carpenter |
| 3:2019cv00067 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Gina M Groh |
| Robert W Trumble |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/30/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (tlg). |
| Filing 4 ** SEALED ** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Richard L. Bates. (Attachments: #1 ledger sheets, #2 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 3 ** SEALED ** Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account by Richard L. Bates. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard L. Bates. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(tlg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lt. Carpenter, Federal Bureau of Prisons Administration at FCI Gilmer, C.O. Radliff, filed by Richard L. Bates. (Attachments: #1 sworn declaration of Richard Bates, #2 BOP health services clinical encounter, #3 letter, #4 letter, #5 witness list, #6 email, #7 incident report, #8 Envelope). Case assigned to MJ Robert Trumble and law clerk Sims.(tlg) Modified on 4/30/2019 to seal attachment #2 medical records per LC Sims (tlg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
