Sweeris v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
James B. Sweeris |
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Does 1 to 50 |
3:2019cv00080 |
May 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Gina M Groh |
Robert W Trumble |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail sent to James B. Sweeris #4 ORDER OF REFERRAL. Return to Sender - Unclaimed - Unable to Forward. (cwm) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number WVNC002624. (cmd) |
Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 05/31/2019. (cwm) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 05/21/2019. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/21/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm). |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. Original notice mailed to pro se plaintiff by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/20/2019: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm). |
Filing 2 ** SEALED** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James B. Sweeris. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(cwm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, Does 1 to 50, filed by James B. Sweeris. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, and #3 Envelope)(cwm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.