PAULLET v. AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Plaintiff: KAREN PAULLET
Defendant: American Public University System
Case Number: 3:2020cv00020
Filed: February 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Gina M Groh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 03/20/2020. (cwm)
March 19, 2020 Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee for Dennis Moskal: $ 200.00, receipt number WVNM001667 (cmd) (Main Document 11 replaced on 3/19/2020 (wrong document attached)) (cmd). Modified on 3/19/2020 NEF regen. (cmd).
March 19, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear local counsel and application for pro hac vice by KAREN PAULLET. (Tsiatsos, Alex)
February 24, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry J. Rector on behalf of American Public University System (Rector, Larry)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OBTAIN LOCAL COUNSEL UNDER LOCAL RULE 83.02. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 02/18/2020. (cwm)
February 14, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Special Appearance Motion for Extension of Time to Obtain Local COunsel Under Local Rule 83.02 by KAREN PAULLET. (Cassidy, Patrick)
February 5, 2020 Filing 6 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION. Notice to attorney Dennis M. Moskal by cm/ecf. (cwm)
February 5, 2020 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Western; Case Number 2:19-cv-01532. (cwm)
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #3 Stipulation filed by KAREN PAULLET. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 02/04/2020. (rgm) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 2/5/2020.]
February 3, 2020 Filing 3 STIPULATION re #2 Waiver of Service Executed, #1 Complaint by KAREN PAULLET. (Moskal, Dennis) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 2/5/2020.]
December 13, 2019 Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by KAREN PAULLET. AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM waiver sent on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020. (Moskal, Dennis) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 2/5/2020.]
November 27, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5375929), filed by KAREN PAULLET. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 2/5/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAULLET v. AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAREN PAULLET
Represented By: Dennis M. Moskal
Represented By: Patrick S. Cassidy
Represented By: Alex A. Tsiatsos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Public University System
Represented By: Larry J. Rector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?